Super Talent MasterDrive SX SAM28GM25S 128GB SSD

Jul 21st, 2009 | By Simon

«»

IOMeter

IOMeter is the latest addition to my hard drive benchmarking suite. The software is highly customizable and what I’m doing only scratches the surface of its capability. I added IOMeter because of flaws in the original solid state drives on the market. After completing all the benchmarks on my first JMicron SSD, I popped into my laptop and made it my day-to-day drive. I found overtime the performance to become really sluggish. At first, MSN messages would take longer to appear and videos would stutter. After some digging on the net, it turned out to be a problem with the random write performance. More information on the issue at hand can be found at AnandTech.

With IOMeter, I set the program up to pepper the drive with a 1GB file with 4KB record sizes, 100% random (as opposed to 100% sequential), 50% read and 50% write for 5 minutes. I generated results for average read and write access times and average read and write transfer rates.

super talent masterdrive sx benchmark

This is best in class performance by the MasterDrive SX; the read and write speeds are at the top and we have the lowest latency numbers compared to the other drives.

Boot Time

super talent masterdrive sx benchmark

As you can predict after seeing the IOMeter results, the Super Talent MasterDrive SX has the quickest boot time in the class. A sizeable difference of almost 10 seconds too. This is clearly a result of the faster access times and random read and write.

«»

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

4 comments
Leave a comment »

  1. There’s a problem with the power consumption chart. The numbers can’t be right unless you’re measuring the power consumption of the system that hosts the drives (but then that’s not clearly stated and it’s confusing)

    Reply  |  Quote
  2. mitrax wrote:

    There’s a problem with the power consumption chart. The numbers can’t be right unless you’re measuring the power consumption of the system that hosts the drives (but then that’s not clearly stated and it’s confusing)

    Sorry for the confusion, the result listed is the power consumption for the entire PC.

    Reply  |  Quote
  3. why are you showing the old gskill?….

    why not post the top (new) drives against new ssd reviews?

    also 128gb differs greatly from 64gb as cache doubles etc…

    thanks

    Reply  |  Quote
  4. showtime wrote:

    why are you showing the old gskill?….
    why not post the top (new) drives against new ssd reviews?
    also 128gb differs greatly from 64gb as cache doubles etc…
    thanks

    For comparison between various types of SSD’s available, not necessarily to compare different manufacturers selling the same SSD. Those numbers will be pretty much the same, it is more interesting to compare old J.Micron vs Indilinx vs Samsung for those looking to upgrade.

    Reply  |  Quote

Leave Comment